Skip directly to: Main page content
image

Webmail

WIFSS @ work
subscribe | unsubscribe

eNewsletter, April 2012
section links:  Meetings  |  Publications  |  In the News 

  bullet  Meetings

Industrial College of the Armed Forces visited UC Davis and WIFSS

April 3, 2012
Davis, CA

A group of 18 persons (16 students and 2 faculty of Agribusiness Industry Study) from the Industrial College of the Armed Forces (ICAF) at the National Defense University visited UC Davis and WIFSS.  The National Defense University campus is located at Fort McNair, Washington, DC.

The group is interested in issues pertaining to food security especially regarding Asia. They are also interested in how U.S. agriculture, agribusiness and research/educational institutions are drivers in the global agricultural products market and how that contributes to food security in the rest of the world. ICAF is a graduate level institution focusing on resourcing at the national strategic level. The students are a 60/40 split of military and civilian, most with 15-20 years’ experience in their professions.  They spent a week looking at Agribusiness in California and visited UC Davis on April 3. Xunde Li met the group at WIFSS, presented to and had a discussion with the group on topics of International Agricultural Economy, Public Health and Food Safety.

| back to top |

ICAF Personnel

ICAF personnel visiting WIFSS.


Food Safety and Water Quality Co-management Forum

April 18, 2012
Watsonville, CA

This program, hosted by Farm, Food Safety, and Conservation Network, included two panel discussions in the morning and a field tour and discussion in the afternoon.   The panel “Keeping Track of Changes in Food Safety Guidelines and Policy” discussed evolving food safety guidelines and policy, including the harmonization efforts between the FDA Food Safety Modernization Act, the California Leafy Greens Marketing Agreement, and UC Davis Good Agricultural Practices (GAP).   Michele Jay-Russell participated in a panel discussion on “The Science of Risk Assessment” about current knowledge on the fate and transport of pathogens in the farm landscape. A news item about the meeting may be found here on the website of the University of California Agriculture and Natural Resources.  The Farm, Food Safety, & Conservation Network is a Central Coast region working group whose purpose is to facilitate the coordination of organizations to support the agricultural industry’s efforts to reduce food safety risks while minimizing impacts to water quality, wildlife and habitat. 

Download the Meeting Agenda.

| back to top |




FDA Produce Farm Investigation Course

April 23-27, 2012
Tampa, FL

The goal of FDA’s Produce Farm Investigation course (ER321) is to train investigators and inspectors on how to conduct investigations at farms and packing facilities that have been implicated in fresh produce related outbreaks and positive pathogen samples. These findings will be used to identify possible contributing factors and environmental antecedents that led to the contamination. This course provides information on practices and conditions that may lead to microbiological contamination of fresh produce.  The course includes presentations, site visits, interviews, hands-on exercises and group discussions. WIFSSBruce Hoar, David Goldenberg, Elisabetta Lambertini, Missy Partyka, Rob Atwill, and Xunde Li participated in the course. FDA will conduct the course again in June and July in California through collaboration with WIFSS.

| back to top |

FDA



  bullet  Publications

Abd, S.J., K.L. McCarthy, and L.J. Harris.  2012.  Impact of storage time and temperature on thermal inactivation of Salmonella Enteritidis PT 30 on oil-roasted almonds.  J. Food Sci. 77(1):M42-M47. 

| back to top |

 

 

 

  bullet  In the News

The Raw Milk Controversy

The New Yorker
Issue dated April 30, 2012

Michele Jay-Russell is quoted in this article by Dana Goodyear about the raw milk controversy.  She also did a phone interview recorded in a podcast on New Yorker Out Loud with Curtis Fox (click on April 30 edition "listen" and the interview comes before the Stanford piece).  The New Yorker focuses on taste and culinary aspects of raw milk.  Jay-Russell provided information on the potential risks of raw milk and importance of weighing these risks against the perceived benefits.  For more information on raw milk, visit www.realrawmilkfacts.com.

| back to top |

New Yorker Cover

 



What consumers want to know about “Mad Cow Disease”

By Mike Payne

On April 24th, 2012 the US Department of Agriculture announced that routine surveillance testing had detected a California dairy cow with Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE).


But why would the USDA’s announcement indicate that the detection of this cow represents no danger to the human food supply?


Some background is helpful in understanding not only this case, but BSE in general:


What is BSE?

Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE) is a degenerative neurological disease of cattle caused by mis-folded proteins (“prions”) that accumulate in the central nervous system. Over a period of years these protein accumulations crowd and kill bovine nerve cells, causing abnormal behavior and leading to the disease’s common name of “Mad Cow Disease”. Historically BSE has been spread in livestock by the feeding of cattle-derived proteins back to cattle, a practice which has been banned in the United States since 1997. Contaminated feed was the cause of the BSE epidemic in the United Kingdom in the 1980s and 1990s, resulting in an decade-long outbreak involving some 180,000 cattle. Subsequently it was determined that, on rare occasions, people consuming tissues of BSE-affected cows could develop a neurological disease similar to both BSE and the human malady Creutzfeldt–Jakob Disease (CJD). Ultimately some 200 human cases of this “new-variant CJD” were identified in people living in the United Kingdom and Europe.


Is the U.S. Food Supply Safe?

Yes. The carcass of the animal detected this week was never presented for slaughter for human consumption and never entered the human food chain. More important than the detection and removal of this particular cow however, are the multi-layered regulatory precautions in place since the 1990s, precautions which are described below. Collectively these safety measures have been successful in protecting both U.S. consumers and livestock from outbreaks of BSE. To date, there have been no cases of BSE transmission to American consumers associated with beef produced in the United States. Lastly, a substantial body of scientific research indicates that BSE is not transmitted through milk.


Is this part of an “Outbreak”?

No. The current evidence suggests that the recently detected animal was a single, isolated case rather than part of an outbreak. Confirmatory testing demonstrated that the suspect animal was positive for “atypical” BSE, a spontaneous form that appears to occur rarely in individual animals. This sporadic form has been detected only twice before in US cattle, once in Texas in 2005 and again in Alabama in 2006. Sophisticated laboratory procedures (immunohistochemistry and Western Blot protein analysis)  can differentiate between the spontaneous “atypical” form of BSE and the “typical” form associated with consumption of contaminated cattle feed. While the current case appears to be isolated, out of an abundance of caution State and Federal investigators are performing an extensive epidemiologic investigation which will include inspection of relevant animals, feed sources and records.


Are BSE Safeguards in U.S. Working?

Yes. Since 1997 the U.S. has implemented interlocking safeguards to protect human and animal health against BSE. Centered on prohibition of feeding ruminant-derived material back to ruminants, these precautions have to date prevented livestock outbreaks in the United States such as occurred in the United Kingdom in the 1980s and 1990s. Worldwide, similar preventative measures have ultimately reduced the number of BSE cases detected in foreign cattle from 37,311 in 1992 to just 29 in 2011. In order to ensure that U.S. safeguards are in place and effective, regulatory agencies continue an extensive BSE surveillance program. Since the surveillance program’s inception in 1990, more than 1 million cattle at greatest risk for BSE have been tested, with about 40,000 high-risk cattle tested annually. This program represents an aggressive surveillance, in fact exceeding international guidelines by 10 fold. Most importantly relative to human health, cattle tissues known to contain concentrations of the prion protein (such as brain, spinal cord, some small intestine, called Specified Risk Materials) are diverted away from the human food chain at slaughter. Lastly, non-ambulatory cattle (sometimes called "downer cows") are also prevented from entering the human food chain.


Taken as a whole, these three interlocking safeguards (the ruminant-to-ruminant fed ban, surveillance testing, removal of Specified Risk Materials from all cattle at slaughter), have been remarkably effective in preventing BSE in cattle from being transmitted to humans. There have been only three cases of “new-variant CJD” described in the United States. All three cases involved foreign nationals, two from the United Kingdom and one from Saudi Arabia. According to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control (CDC), there is strong evidence indicating that all three of these patients contracted disease while in their home country rather than during their stay in the U.S.


What is the University of California Doing to Help?

The University of California assists farmers in complying with the important feed regulations that prevent BSE from entering a herd.
Outreach materials from the University of California:

Additional information:


| back to top |

USDA

 

 



Copyright © The Regents of the University of California, Davis campus, 2007-12. All Rights Reserved.